Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks

Neither do I, but I don't see a need to defend or keep it either.

Looks like ~~everyone~~(everyone who generalizes is a fool) most monks in the Monastery are programmed like this:

if ($NODE->{title} =~ /new feature/) {
    
    print [
      'You already have that feature in your browser',
      'You can already do that manually with X',
      'The DB server is already very loaded',
      'No' # I ran out of ideas ;)
    ]->[rand(4)];

}
[download]

He who asks will be a fool for five minutes, but he who doesn't ask will remain a fool for life.

Chady | http://chady.net/

Comment on Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Dec 08, 2003 at 15:04 UTC

if ($NODE->{title} =~ /new feature/) {
    print "I like things the way they are, and your suggest does not s
+eem better",$/;
}
[download]

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

[reply]
[d/l]

Re^4: Reputation for anonymous monks

by Coruscate (Sexton) on Dec 08, 2003 at 17:35 UTC

Perhaps even this:

if ($NODE->{title} =~ /(?:XP|vote|voting|reputation)/ or
    $NODE->{content} =~ /(?:XP|vote|voting|reputation)/) {
  print "Your name has been appended to the enormous",
    " list of people who dislike the implementation",
    " of the Voting/Experience System. Perhaps one day",
    " the whole thing will be discarded as a horrible",
    " failure.";
}
[download]

[reply]
[d/l]

Re: Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 09, 2003 at 06:37 UTC

Give them some credit, Eliza's code is at least slightly more complex than that ;-P

[reply]