in reply to Re^2: Better name and description for this section (replying)
in thread Better name and description for this section

Ah, thanks -- I didn't realize the section pages still used the wrong one of those (and passes a plethoria of unused parameters); will fix.

Oh, while I remember -- when you do your changes to Everything::HTML.pm, can you change urlGen, line 513, to sepperate with ';' instead of '&'? It'd make our HTML much cleaner... Oh. Looks like you already uploaded the changes, thanks!

  • Comment on Re^3: Better name and description for this section (replying)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Better name and description for this section (replying)
by de-merphq (Beadle) on Sep 12, 2004 at 11:06 UTC

    I didn't realize the section pages still used the wrong one of those (and passes a plethoria of unused parameters); will fix.

    Just out of curiousty what do you mean here? Did i do something wrong?

    ---
    alter ego of demerphq
[reply]

      No, the problem is in newlistapproved listapproved settings embed node with vote container, not your code -- and I should have fixed it when I fixed shownote.

      OTOH, you're wrong about what missing from reply settings means -- it means not-replyable. More speicificly: the entry replyTypes is a comma-sepperated list of nodetype names that replies to should be notes. The other entries should have keys of nodetype names that are replyable, and values of the nodetype that replying to them creates. Note that there is no optional whitespace before or after those commas.

      Hm, now we need to make super-search know about this section.

      Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

[reply]

        OTOH, you're wrong about

        Maybe i misremember but im pretty sure I hacked exactly this behaviour in to deal with pmdevnote. Possibly it wasnt the correct thing to do, and also possibly I misremember.

        ---
        alter ego of demerphq
[reply]

        Reviewed your other patches and i see what was happening now. Sorry for the confusion.

        ---
        alter ego of demerphq
[reply]

In Section Inner Scriptorium