Re^2: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by educated_foo (Vicar) on Apr 13, 2006 at 19:10 UTC
Autocompletion? What are you using for that?	[reply]
Re^4: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by diotalevi (Canon) on Apr 13, 2006 at 19:13 UTC
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Autocomplete ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; (defadvice cperl-indent-command (around cperl-indent-or-complete) "Changes \\[cperl-indent-command] so it autocompletes when at the en +d of a word." (if (looking-at "\\>") (dabbrev-expand nil) ad-do-it)) (defun cperl-dabbrev-installer () (set (make-local-variable 'dabbrev-case-fold-search) nil) (set (make-local-variable 'dabbrev-case-replace) nil)) (eval-after-load "cperl-mode" '(progn (require 'dabbrev) (ad-activate 'cperl-indent-command) (add-hook 'cperl-mode-hook #'cperl-dabbrev-installer))) [download] ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by educated_foo (Vicar) on Apr 13, 2006 at 19:54 UTC
Okay. The Eclipse fanboys will say that doesn't complete methods and such since it's just textual, but dabbrev works well in practice, and is a wonderful thing for all kinds of documents. btw, one nice trick I use for indent-or-complete commands is to complete on the second "TAB" when the line hasn't moved, rather than when at end-of-word, like so (pseudocode): `(defun my-indent-or-complete () (interactive) (let ((pos (point))) (indent-command) (when (and (= pos (point)) (eq last-command 'my-indent-or-complete)) (complete-command))))` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by diotalevi (Canon) on Apr 13, 2006 at 21:53 UTC
Re^7: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by educated_foo (Vicar) on Apr 14, 2006 at 02:19 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^3: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by radiantmatrix (Parson) on Apr 14, 2006 at 15:03 UTC
Sure thing, a wide screenshot slice will have to do, with Getopt::Long's source loaded in the editor window. Folding in Emacs or vim accomplishes much the same thing, so I wouldn't recommend switching to Eclipse for just this one convenience. I haven't been able to get folding working with EPIC (the Eclipse Perl plugin), but I found the mechanism under discussion to do what I wanted folding for. YMMV, of course. <-radiant.matrix-> A collection of thoughts and links from the minds of geeks The Code that can be seen is not the true Code I haven't found a problem yet that can't be solved by a well-placed trebuchet	[reply]
Re^4: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by wazoox (Prior) on Apr 14, 2006 at 16:29 UTC
People often overlook ctags, but it render more or less the same service with almost any existing editor.	[reply]
Re^5: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell by radiantmatrix (Parson) on Apr 17, 2006 at 16:25 UTC
Indeed! In fact, Emacs and vim will use the tags files in a reasonably intelligent manner, making for a pretty nifty code browser. I'd nearly forgotten about it, thanks for the reminder. <-radiant.matrix-> A collection of thoughts and links from the minds of geeks The Code that can be seen is not the true Code I haven't found a problem yet that can't be solved by a well-placed trebuchet	[reply]