in reply to Re^12: Native newline encoding
in thread Native newline encoding

apparently you misread it

I didn't misread anything. I simply quoted "the spec". Full stop.

Or are you claiming

I'm not "claiming" anything. I quoted "the spec". The official W3C XML specification document. Nothing more.

So, take your puerile accusations, fetid mis-inferences, and dubious reasons for joining a long purposeless thread, back to wherever you've been hiding.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^14: Native newline encoding
by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 30, 2012 at 20:13 UTC

    I simply quoted "the spec"

    The first three words of the document you quoted says it's not the spec. You're blindness is growing X_X

    I quoted "the spec". The official W3C XML specification document. Nothing more.

    A complete lie. "Really? Then I guess you missed section" does not appear anywhere on the W3C site. Are you through pretending I'm talking about one thing when I'm talking about another?

    I'm not "claiming" anything.

    Then congratulations for quoting an irrelevant passage twice and for all the lovely accusations for missing it.

    take your puerile accusations

    No. I hold fast my accusation. You misread the passage you quoted if you think it mentioned anything about XML being a text format. Name calling, otoh is quite puerile.

    I shall also accuse you of not knowing the definition of puerile. No child would make such an accusation.

[reply]

      The quote is in this post. And the quoted text is a live link that links directly to http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#charsets

      And that is the official spec on the w3c website.

      If you are incapable of following a link; take your unmarked, belated updates and accusations of "lies" (a word you clearly do not know the meaning of), and shut the f*** up!

      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

      The start of some sanity?

[reply]

        What about that quote (which I said I've seen twice already) and that post (which I said I saw already)?

        Suuuuure, an official spec says "go over here if you want the spec".

        I'm using the "An intentionally false statement" definition.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom