in reply to Re^13: Native newline encoding
in thread Native newline encoding

I simply quoted "the spec"

The first three words of the document you quoted says it's not the spec. You're blindness is growing X_X

I quoted "the spec". The official W3C XML specification document. Nothing more.

A complete lie. "Really? Then I guess you missed section" does not appear anywhere on the W3C site. Are you through pretending I'm talking about one thing when I'm talking about another?

I'm not "claiming" anything.

Then congratulations for quoting an irrelevant passage twice and for all the lovely accusations for missing it.

take your puerile accusations

No. I hold fast my accusation. You misread the passage you quoted if you think it mentioned anything about XML being a text format. Name calling, otoh is quite puerile.

I shall also accuse you of not knowing the definition of puerile. No child would make such an accusation.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^15: Native newline encoding
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 30, 2012 at 20:39 UTC

    The quote is in this post. And the quoted text is a live link that links directly to http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#charsets

    And that is the official spec on the w3c website.

    If you are incapable of following a link; take your unmarked, belated updates and accusations of "lies" (a word you clearly do not know the meaning of), and shut the f*** up!

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    The start of some sanity?

[reply]

      What about that quote (which I said I've seen twice already) and that post (which I said I saw already)?

      Suuuuure, an official spec says "go over here if you want the spec".

      I'm using the "An intentionally false statement" definition.

[reply]

        What are you on?

        If you follow the link, and scroll to the top of the page it reads:

        Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition) W3C Recommendation 26 November 2008

        People wonder why I get frustrated by other supposedly intelligent people that cannot even follow a link and read what's there.

        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

        The start of some sanity?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom