Re: Better name and description for this section

I like "Cabalist's Chambers", "Cabalist's Council Chambers", "Cabalist's Chancery", etc... though upon more reflection, tye's suggestion might be better.

Oh, added pmtopic => note to reply settings. tye, how did you manage to reply without this?

Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

Comment on Re: Better name and description for this section

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Better name and description for this section (replying) by tye (Sage) on Sep 09, 2004 at 23:36 UTC
Perhaps I commented on (actually, I think I replied and you commented on) ? I selected 'reply' from the main section page. I didn't notice anything unusual. - tye	[reply]
Re^3: Better name and description for this section (replying) by theorbtwo (Prior) on Sep 10, 2004 at 10:55 UTC
Ah, thanks -- I didn't realize the section pages still used the wrong one of those (and passes a plethoria of unused parameters); will fix. Oh, while I remember -- when you do your changes to Everything::HTML.pm, can you change urlGen, line 513, to sepperate with ';' instead of '&'? It'd make our HTML much cleaner... Oh. Looks like you already uploaded the changes, thanks!	[reply]
Re^4: Better name and description for this section (replying) by de-merphq (Beadle) on Sep 12, 2004 at 11:06 UTC
I didn't realize the section pages still used the wrong one of those (and passes a plethoria of unused parameters); will fix. Just out of curiousty what do you mean here? Did i do something wrong? --- alter ego of demerphq	[reply]
Re^5: Better name and description for this section (replying) by theorbtwo (Prior) on Sep 12, 2004 at 11:36 UTC
Re^6: Better name and description for this section (replying) by de-merphq (Beadle) on Sep 12, 2004 at 11:45 UTC
Re^6: Better name and description for this section (replying) by de-merphq (Beadle) on Sep 12, 2004 at 12:37 UTC
Re^2: Better name and description for this section by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 10, 2004 at 06:19 UTC
how did you manage to reply without this? Absent an entry in reply_settings it defaults to type 'note'. --- demerphq _{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi Flux8}	[reply]