Re^4: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by Marshall (Canon) on Jul 02, 2009 at 22:20 UTC
Yes, I am aware of that. The question evolved into whether Win32:Daemon or the PerlSvc utility from ActiveState was "better". That I don't know. I suspect that "this depends on X,Y,Z..." (ie your mileage may vary).	[reply]
Re^6: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by mzedeler (Pilgrim) on Jul 02, 2009 at 22:58 UTC
I won't get to try it out this time. Fortunately I've been let off the hook and can now return to writing perl for Linux (and the like).	[reply]
Re^7: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by Marshall (Canon) on Jul 02, 2009 at 23:55 UTC
I have used the ActiveState tools in their PDK to make .exe versions of Perl. And with good success, albeit with some huge frustrations and many weeks of "work-a-round" effort. I don't know what would be involved with Win32:Daemon vs PerlSvc. I suspect some big problems either way! If anybody else our there knows about this difference, let us know!	[reply]