Re^4: When does it make sense to preload modules when starting Starman?

"...From what I heard...Moose..."

I do not plan no more to go for another mysterious traveller. Once upon a time i gave it a try and abandoned all hope afterwards as hostile takeover was my first impression. Your mileage may vary. Best regards, Karl

ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť

Comment on Re^4: When does it make sense to preload modules when starting Starman?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: When does it make sense to preload modules when starting Starman? by LanX (Saint) on Oct 28, 2021 at 13:59 UTC
you asked for an example, you got one. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^6: When does it make sense to preload modules when starting Starman? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Oct 28, 2021 at 19:00 UTC
Yes, thanks. I totally misunderstood you. Sorry. Best regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]
Re^5: When does it make sense to preload modules when starting Starman? by perlfan (Vicar) on Oct 29, 2021 at 08:39 UTC
>hostile takeover You mean you don't like code that's 99% declarations and relies on 7 more levels of implicit occult behavior that's impossible to debug for a traditional Perl programmer? Moose is basically what mod_perlN is to Apache, except as applied back onto innocent Perl.	[reply]
Re^6: When does it make sense to preload modules when starting Starman? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Oct 30, 2021 at 07:45 UTC
"You mean..." Yeah. Something like that. Regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks