Re^2: WIN redirecting STDOUT and STDIN to new spawned CMD console

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: WIN redirecting STDOUT and STDIN to new spawned CMD console by LanX (Saint) on Mar 29, 2023 at 07:58 UTC
> would be a very* roundabout fashion* Well with variations it's just a classic. You start a second console running the application redirecting STDERR to a log file. The first console does a `tail -f` on the log-file With PowerShell in the first window at least that's technically feasible, it has a `tail` like mechanism. ° > Perhaps better with a named pipe Not sure how hard it is to have named pipes on windows. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery} updates °) `Get-Content -Path ".\err.log" -Wait`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: WIN redirecting STDOUT and STDIN to new spawned CMD console by soonix (Canon) on Mar 29, 2023 at 08:19 UTC
I'm only half (or even less) certain that I already used named pipes on Windows, but both MS and SO say that it's possible. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/ipc/named-pipes https://stackoverflow.com/a/192187 https://stackoverflow.com/a/176140	[reply]
Re^5: WIN redirecting STDOUT and STDIN to new spawned CMD console by bliako (Monsignor) on Mar 29, 2023 at 10:35 UTC
Also, https://rkeithhill.wordpress.com/2014/11/01/windows-powershell-and-named-pipes/ one of many links showing how to create them pipes in powershell. Oh you need to ignite the pipe server! `I can't believe it's not butter` lol. And lol2 reading the comments under SO links provided above, like: `A\|B\|C` is possible but it waits A to finish in order to "pipe" its output into B and ditto on to C. I stop here lest this becomes trolling. Q: can IPC::Run be used to create windows pipes? LIMITATIONS section says it's experimental.	[reply] [d/l] [select]


Welcome to the Monastery
	PerlMonks

Re^2: WIN redirecting STDOUT and STDIN to new spawned CMD console

updates