Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by cjf (Parson) on Apr 05, 2002 at 15:20 UTC
|
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by jryan (Vicar) on Apr 05, 2002 at 15:28 UTC
|
Other than a few that you mentioned, here are the ones that I have been putting off using:
- Parse::RecDescent - I tend to do most of my parsing with split and regex (and specific modules, such as HTML::Parser, etc), and I can usually get what I need done without much problem. However, I often get the feeling that familiarity with Parse::RecDescent could save me tons of work.
-
Win32::* - I work in Windows a lot of the time, and it would be nice to know what I could actually use it for (Windows, I mean) ;)
-
POE - For all of the attention it gets, it HAS to be good, right? :) But seriously, reworking code to use this module might be very handy if I find myself forking off waaaay to many processes.
-
Inline - Because its so damn neat.
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by Dog and Pony (Priest) on Apr 05, 2002 at 15:35 UTC
|
Still looking for a use for Tie::Hash::Cannabinol of course. :)
More seriously, modules that I want to learn, want to use, or really should learn/use (no order):
- Safe - no excuse to not use.
- Storable - lots of uses for persistence indeed.
- Net::ICQ - must be a cool use. Maybe access the chatterbox from ICQ? *grin*
- One or several (HTML) templating modules/systems. It is embarrasing to do HERE docs or PHP.
- Thread - with my java background, I am indeed interested.
- The IO:: modules - like object-orientation better. :)
- The XML modules - I had lots of trouble with these when on Windows, but now I run Linux fulltime too. Is about time.
- The B:: modules - interesting stuff.
- wxPerl (also thinking to reopen some C++ knowledge to try out wxWindows itself)
- And probably a lot more that I will add here as I remember them...
You have moved into a dark place.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue. | [reply] |
(jeffa) Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by jeffa (Bishop) on Apr 05, 2002 at 16:19 UTC
|
| [reply] |
|
Image::Magick - I have tried to install this like 5 times now and fail miserably each time, although i do get just a little closer each time
I must say I have never managed to install it. Even when it works, after a clean installation of any good Linux distribution, I inevitably manage to break it when I upgrade Perl. I even suspect that I have broken it when upgrading some of the package it uses.
So now I have basically given up on it, I just use system convert ..., which always works, and I am much happier!
| [reply] |
|
I've managed to install it... several times. I thought it'd be great since I've been using ImageMagick itself lots earlier, but I never got Image::Magick to work properly. I felt it was both poorly documented, if at all, and really buggy. I also resorted to system commands, because it just works and "good enough". :) It was a while ago though, so maybe I'll give it yet another shot. Maybe.
You have moved into a dark place.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by cheshirecat (Sexton) on Apr 05, 2002 at 15:17 UTC
|
POE::*, basically this looks to me as a powerful hammer looking for a lot of nails.
I'm also intending to look at SPOPS and Mason.
SPOPS looks very interesting to me as it seems to model a lot of what I want in an app framework.
Cheers
Cheshire Cat *8-) | [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by rinceWind (Monsignor) on Apr 05, 2002 at 15:31 UTC
|
It's interesting the lack of round tuits these days. My list of modules is currently: That's just for starters. I could probably thing of many more.
My attitude to modules is to learn and use them on an as-and-when required basis. This does mean I have to expend time searching to see if I am re-inventing the wheel before putting finger to keyboard, but it means that my appreciation of modules is from a practical standpoint - and this is changing as I look at how one prepares modules for CPAN publication.
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by TrinityInfinity (Scribe) on Apr 05, 2002 at 15:34 UTC
|
I have three in front of me that I'm currently tackling,
... hopefully using these three (and other associated) modules, I can build up my own home page so I don't have to run all over the internet for the news I want, etc. That and if I can rebuild some previous projects using CGI::Application and HTML::Template, I won't get hassled so much and things will be easier to maintain :)
It's not alot, but I'm still learning! :D | [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by shadox (Priest) on Apr 05, 2002 at 16:40 UTC
|
My modules wishlist is:
- xwPerl
- Image::Magick
- Crypt::*
- XML::*
- Soap::Lite
- HTML::Embperl
- Net::SSH::Perl
- Win32::GUI (when i finish with the others)
There will be more to come, but first i would like to use these.
Failure is not an option - it is a privilege reserved for
those who do not try hard enough.
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by Albannach (Monsignor) on Apr 05, 2002 at 18:04 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by runrig (Abbot) on Apr 05, 2002 at 16:09 UTC
|
I was leaning toward learning Perl/Tk, I even bought the new
book for it, but now I'm leaning toward using WxPerl when
I get around to making my GUI app happen...anyone around who
knows both that has opinions?
------------
ooo O\O ooo tilly was here :,(
| [reply] |
|
I found (GUI) Windows Programming FAQ a very good read for comparisons of that and more, and I am also leaning towards wxPerl (goes to update earlier answer).
You have moved into a dark place.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
| [reply] |
Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by belg4mit (Prior) on Apr 05, 2002 at 21:18 UTC
|
| [reply] |
(podmaster) Re: Modules that you want to know but haven't used yet
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Apr 05, 2002 at 21:52 UTC
|
well since nobody mentioned these, and I really use them often, i gotta
Devel::Trace
Devel::TraceMethods (which I reinvented once)
Net::Dict
XML::TokeParser - oh how I love this one ;)
Parallel::ForkManager - i no want to think about forking semantics (i don't need IPC)
and last but not least, japhys YAPE dists.
update: right, well with less than a month of usage, I felt they qualified.
Look ma', I'm on CPAN.
** The Third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy. | [reply] |
|
| [reply] |