We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Abstain option?by talexb (Chancellor) |
on Sep 10, 2002 at 13:07 UTC ( [id://196659]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Interesting idea, but to paraphrase Ovid, this is a solution looking for a problem. I don't think it would improve the Perl Monks experience (no pun intended).
In fact, the nice thing about never seeing the current rep of a node you haven't voted on (well, except for Best Nodes and Worst Nodes) is that you are forced to take the post at face value. I know there are some Monks whose posts I pay much more attention to, but I don't ++ anyone unless I feel their post has added something to the discussion, either by way of providing new information or a new approach, or warnings about what not to do. I occasionally use the dreaded -- when a post is a waste of bandwidth, or, on rare occasions, when I strongly disagree with the writer. The reputation of a node is feedback, but that feedback is only allowed after you've cast your vote. I don't think adding an abstention option would add anything to the current system.
--t. alex
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|