Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI (fallibility)

by Anonymous Monk
on Apr 16, 2003 at 12:33 UTC ( [id://250866]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI (fallibility)
in thread Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI

Wise words indeed. I've often wondered about the need to elevate certain individuals in a community to god-like status. This, of course, transcends Perl (and programming languages, and software, and so on) but still, more often than not, seems detrimental. I don't think it really provides an incentive to most programmers, but then again I never paid attention in psychology ;)

Also, as you touched on, near-fanatical devotions to certain paradigms doesn't help much either. Any code that doesn't conform to these specifications is instantly looked down upon. It's also the first thing that's looked for as a problem in posted code, often causing the reviewer to ignore actual errors and give advice like "add use strict, then repost" which doesn't really help anything.

So basically "me too" to the parent post :)

  • Comment on Re: Re: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI (fallibility)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI (fallibility)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Apr 16, 2003 at 13:14 UTC
    I might be inclined to post that on occasion, when the code shown is messy and the mistake not obvious. So even making an absolute out of "add use strict, then repost posts are useless" is (mostly *g*) useless.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://250866]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 07:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found