Normally, when the site redirects you to a 'default' page, it is The Monastery Gates. If you'd rather have it go to a different page, visit your User Settings and enter the node ID in the 'Preferred Default Page' field.

Currently, this is only respected in the Log In page. The plan is to have it respected in other places as well.

Hi. Is there a limit to the number of permitted responses ?? I have a thread which seems to not permit another reponse.

Regards JC......

just a small change, but maybe hard to implement, of a behaviour I find a bit annoying.

• actual behaviour If I go from page A to page B and then I vote for some node the page refresh afeter hitting the stumbit buttom. So if I use the Back button of the browser I find myself still in page B
  
  
• desired behaviour I vote for some node in page B and if I go back in history with the browser I land in A

• make the vote something inline within the page as suggested by an uberwise monk, so that clicking the voting button does not reload the page via a submit button but records the vote
  
  
• use the OnSubmit (or whatever is called) to remove the page from browser history

L*

Hi. As the title suggests, is it possible to access one own postings.

Regard JC......

UPDATE: These two nodes are also relevant Patterns in PerlMonks Searches and Exact words in super search, however, it's still not entirely clear to me what the 'separate strings with' option does, since the search matches substrings.

Just some quick notes:

I have updated chatterbot to disable self-referencing Karma (chatterbot will quip that he dropped your vote into the recycling bin or something similar). It's not 100% foolproof, but it's better than before.

I have also fixed a timezone bug in the CBStats "special nodes" section that watches for Paco to return. This might or might not break when switching between daylight savings and standard time.

If you have noticed any other bugs, just send me a private message.

Since some days and only using Chrome (version 125.0.6422.113 (Official Build 64 bit) I cannot browse anymore perlmonks.org (nor www. .com .net etc.) because of the following weird error: NET::ERR_CERT_INVALID and inspecting the certificate I see the certificate presented is: css.perlmonks.com Common Name: <empty> issued by: Common Name: GTB Technologies, Inc (46115)

If I inspect it with openssl.exe (I'm on windows but I dont lean out of it.. :) and grep I see valid certs only:

 openssl s_client -showcerts -servername 66.39.54.27 -connect css.perl
+monks.org:443 2>/nul | grep CN
   i:/C=GB/ST=Greater Manchester/L=Salford/O=Sectigo Limited/CN=Sectig
+o RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
 1 s:/C=GB/ST=Greater Manchester/L=Salford/O=Sectigo Limited/CN=Sectig
+o RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
   i:/C=US/ST=New Jersey/L=Jersey City/O=The USERTRUST Network/CN=USER
+Trust RSA Certification Authority
issuer=/C=GB/ST=Greater Manchester/L=Salford/O=Sectigo Limited/CN=Sect
+igo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
^C^C
[download]

without grepping the output I notice: Verify return code: 20 (unable to get local issuer certificate) but that shoud not be an issue.

The same happens with openssl   .... -servername 216.92.34.251 ... (the other IP).

I cleaned the site's data and all data from all website stored in Chrome (not cleared cookies tho) and reboot happened in the meanwhile.

If I export the certificates I can also see right SAN (Subject Alternative Names):

...but with this strange issuer: Issuer: C = US, CN = "GTB Technologies, Inc (46115)" it does it means I'm under a transparent device masking my request? If so why not with Firefox? Just for your info and in the hope these are useful informations.

L*

Hi, until recently when you posted a private message to a user you saw below the chatterbox something like "You said "foo" to bar". This was a useful confirmation that the private message was sent correctly. It's no longer appearing. Can we have it back?

Thanks!

Problem is that "Monk Quips off:" is checked in my Display Settings.

Furthermore I'm wondering if banalities should really be shown in alarm 🚨 style.

I suppose it's another regression of recent patches on messaging.

See also: Private messages stopped showing feedback on success

I created this account Nov 3, 2005 and have logged in multiple times since.

Seems the account has been deleted. Any idea why?

I went so far as to recreate the account just now, to see if I could re-claim it. The UI allowed the submission, and told me that an email would be sent shortly (to the original email associated with the account). I received no email.

Either there's a decent delay between account creation and the sending of a temp password, or there's some bug that allows people to re-sign up for a deleted account...

Did I break some code of conduct? Did I break some terms of service?

Guess I won't get that 20 year PM anniversary after all.

-Frustrated