Recently Active Threads

█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

Viewing Nodes As of: <<<< <<< << < 2018-07-31 > >> >>> >>>>
Current View Mode is Full Thread, switch to Root and Node, Minimal Nodes or Node Ancestors
Jump to Help | Legend | Page Settings | PerlMonks Discussion | Questions | Meditations | Cool Uses For Perl | Polls | Users

+/-PerlMonks Discussion (Top)

RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (A:16/88/4)+/- 2018-07-24 21:10 7 years ago

[jdporter]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (2/11)+/- 2018-07-24 21:29 7 years ago
  
  [hippo]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (3/7)+/- 2018-07-24 21:44 7 years ago
    
    [jdporter]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-24 22:12 7 years ago
      
      [pryrt]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-25 07:23 7 years ago
        
        [dsheroh]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-25 05:52 7 years ago
      
      [Corion]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-25 13:02 7 years ago
        
        [jdporter]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/2)+/- 2018-07-25 09:27 7 years ago
      
      [hippo]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-25 13:04 7 years ago
        
        [jdporter]
        
        Re^5: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-25 13:17 7 years ago
        
        [hippo]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors [7](1/2)+/- 2018-07-25 07:04 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-25 07:09 7 years ago
      
      [Corion]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors [5] 2018-07-25 15:47 7 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors -- suggestions (1/2)+/- 2018-07-25 07:46 7 years ago
  
  [Discipulus]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors -- suggestions (1)+/- 2018-07-25 10:37 7 years ago
    
    [QM]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors -- suggestions 2018-07-31 20:18 7 years ago
      
      [jdporter]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors ( DISPUTED ) 2018-07-25 09:46 7 years ago
  
  [LanX]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-25 16:31 7 years ago
  
  [Perlbotics]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-25 17:32 7 years ago
    
    [jdporter]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (4/9/1)+/- 2018-07-25 17:53 7 years ago
  
  [shmem]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/2)+/- 2018-07-25 18:21 7 years ago
    
    [hippo]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-25 22:01 7 years ago
      
      [shmem]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-26 08:19 7 years ago
        
        [hippo]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/3/1)+/- 2018-07-25 20:06 7 years ago
    
    [jdporter]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/2/1)+/- 2018-07-26 01:21 7 years ago
      
      [shmem]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-30 14:36 7 years ago
        
        [jdporter]
        
        Re^5: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-08-02 23:15 7 years ago
        
        [shmem]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-25 21:50 7 years ago
    
    [erix]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-26 08:49 7 years ago
    
    [marto]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-25 23:12 7 years ago
  
  [Your Mother]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-26 04:52 7 years ago
  
  [trippledubs]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-30 13:34 7 years ago
    
    [jdporter]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (2/3/2)+/- 2018-07-26 09:02 7 years ago
  
  [Tux]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-26 09:16 7 years ago
    
    [BrowserUk]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-30 16:40 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-31 01:29 7 years ago
      
      [trippledubs]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-26 09:14 7 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-26 09:41 7 years ago
    
    [marto]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-07-26 19:32 7 years ago
  
  [Veltro]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-27 00:06 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-07-26 20:41 7 years ago
  
  [roho]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (2/5)+/- 2018-07-31 20:43 7 years ago
  
  [jdporter]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2021-03-03 16:24 5 years ago
    
    [haukex]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2021-03-04 18:44 5 years ago
      
      [jdporter]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (Flag for regulars) (1/2)+/- 2024-09-01 14:46 1 year ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (Flag for regulars) (1)+/- 2024-09-01 15:14 1 year ago
      
      [jdporter]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (Flag for regulars) 2024-09-01 17:18 1 year ago
        
        [LanX]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (2/13)+/- 2018-08-01 09:47 7 years ago
  
  [anonymized user 468275]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/4)+/- 2018-08-02 01:02 7 years ago
    
    [jdporter]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/3)+/- 2018-08-02 09:04 7 years ago
      
      [anonymized user 468275]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/2)+/- 2018-08-02 11:19 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-08-02 14:54 7 years ago
        
        [anonymized user 468275]
        
        Re^6: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-08-02 15:31 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
  - Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (2/7)+/- 2018-08-02 02:07 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors [-X](1/4)+/- 2018-08-02 06:59 7 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1/3)+/- 2018-08-02 18:47 7 years ago
        
        [Your Mother]
    - Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors (1)+/- 2018-08-06 11:01 7 years ago
      
      [Corion]
      - Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-08-06 11:20 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
- Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors 2018-09-18 17:12 7 years ago
  
  [mr_mischief]

+/-Questions (Top)

Scraping a website (A) 2018-07-31 01:50 7 years ago

[alialialia]
redacting from config hash (FA) 2018-07-31 01:45 7 years ago

[Aldebaran]
Parse html file (A:4/18/6)+/- 2018-07-30 20:50 7 years ago

[TonyNY]
- Re: Parse html file 2018-07-30 21:10 7 years ago
  
  [haukex]
- Re: Parse html file 2018-07-30 21:16 7 years ago
  
  [atcroft]
- Re: Parse html file (2/14/2)+/- 2018-07-30 21:21 7 years ago
  
  [davido]
  - Re^2: Parse html file (1/7/1)+/- 2018-07-30 21:24 7 years ago
    
    [TonyNY]
    - Re^3: Parse html file (1/6)+/- 2018-07-30 21:59 7 years ago
      
      [davido]
      - Re^4: Parse html file (1/5)+/- 2018-08-01 14:15 7 years ago
        
        [TonyNY]
        
        Re^5: Parse html file (1/4)+/- 2018-08-01 14:28 7 years ago
        
        [marto]
        
        Re^6: Parse html file (2/3)+/- 2018-08-01 14:41 7 years ago
        
        [TonyNY]
        
        Re^7: Parse html file [3](1)+/- 2018-08-17 00:02 7 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
        
        Re^8: Parse html file 2018-08-17 06:23 7 years ago
        
        [marto]
        
        Re^7: Parse html file 2018-08-17 06:22 7 years ago
        
        [marto]
  - Re^2: Parse html file (1/5)+/- 2018-09-24 12:31 7 years ago
    
    [TonyNY]
    - Re^3: Parse html file (1/4)+/- 2018-09-24 18:01 7 years ago
      
      [tangent]
      - Re^4: Parse html file (1/3)+/- 2018-09-24 19:08 7 years ago
        
        [TonyNY]
        
        Re^5: Parse html file (1/2)+/- 2018-09-24 19:28 7 years ago
        
        [tangent]
        
        Re^6: Parse html file (1)+/- 2018-09-25 13:18 7 years ago
        
        [TonyNY]
        
        Re^7: Parse html file 2018-09-25 13:25 7 years ago
        
        [marto]
- Re: Parse html file 2018-07-30 21:46 7 years ago
  
  [marto]
function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 (FA:5/7/2)+/- 2018-07-30 18:01 7 years ago

[topherv]
- Re: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 2018-07-30 18:07 7 years ago
  
  [Corion]
- Re: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 2018-07-30 19:29 7 years ago
  
  [Laurent_R]
- Re: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 2018-07-31 06:39 7 years ago
  
  [dave_the_m]
- Re: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 (2)+/- 2018-08-01 11:28 7 years ago
  
  [topherv]
  - Re^2: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 2018-08-01 13:09 7 years ago
    
    [dave_the_m]
  - Re^2: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 2018-08-01 14:00 7 years ago
    
    [Tux]
- Re: function prototyping & perl 5.8.20 2018-08-03 10:48 7 years ago
  
  [topherv]
trying to use join in a loop (FA:7/6)+/- 2018-07-30 12:26 7 years ago

[lamasculo]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-30 12:31 7 years ago
  
  [Corion]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-30 12:42 7 years ago
  
  [lamasculo]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-30 12:46 7 years ago
  
  [haj]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-30 13:22 7 years ago
  
  [lamasculo]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-30 13:23 7 years ago
  
  [Eily]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-30 19:24 7 years ago
  
  [BillKSmith]
- Re: trying to use join in a loop 2018-07-31 09:42 7 years ago
  
  [kcott]
difference between two lines (A:3/5)+/- 2018-07-30 08:13 7 years ago

[vinoth.ree]
- Re: difference between two lines (1/2)+/- 2018-07-30 08:18 7 years ago
  
  [Corion]
  - Re^2: difference between two lines (1)+/- 2018-07-30 09:13 7 years ago
    
    [vinoth.ree]
    - Re^3: difference between two lines 2018-07-30 09:48 7 years ago
      
      [Eily]
- Re: difference between two lines 2018-07-30 09:54 7 years ago
  
  [thanos1983]
- Re: difference between two lines 2018-07-30 10:36 7 years ago
  
  [afoken]
SFTP on Windows (FA:7/13/8)+/- 2018-07-30 06:32 7 years ago

[Poolstar]
- Re: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-30 07:03 7 years ago
  
  [davies]
- Re: SFTP on Windows (1)+/- 2018-07-30 07:13 7 years ago
  
  [Corion]
  - Re^2: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-30 14:08 7 years ago
    
    [Lotus1]
- Re: SFTP on Windows (1/5/3)+/- 2018-07-30 07:32 7 years ago
  
  [salva]
  - Re^2: SFTP on Windows (3/4/2)+/- 2018-07-30 11:24 7 years ago
    
    [Poolstar]
    - Re^3: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-30 11:39 7 years ago
      
      [Corion]
    - Re^3: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-30 12:30 7 years ago
      
      [marto]
    - Re^3: SFTP on Windows (1)+/- 2018-07-31 05:19 7 years ago
      
      [Poolstar]
      - Re^4: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-31 05:35 7 years ago
        
        [marto]
- Re: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-30 07:37 7 years ago
  
  [Poolstar]
- Re: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-31 07:04 7 years ago
  
  [jahero]
- Re: SFTP on Windows 2018-07-31 13:02 7 years ago
  
  [Poolstar]
- Re: SFTP on Windows 2018-08-03 09:33 7 years ago
  
  [Poolstar]
Is cpan being purged? [8](FA:3/1)+/- 2018-07-30 00:24 7 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Is cpan being purged? 2018-07-30 02:04 7 years ago
  
  [marto]
- Re: Is cpan being purged? 2018-07-30 03:21 7 years ago
  
  [ikegami]
- Re: Is cpan being purged? 2018-07-30 09:32 7 years ago
  
  [liz]
retain longest multi words units from hash [16](F:9/27/2)+/- 2018-07-28 10:42 7 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash (3/5)+/- 2018-07-28 11:32 7 years ago
  
  [LanX]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash (1)+/- 2018-07-28 11:41 7 years ago
    
    [Corion]
    - Re^3: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-28 11:48 7 years ago
      
      [LanX]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash [17](1)+/- 2018-07-28 12:02 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re^3: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-28 12:25 7 years ago
      
      [LanX]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-28 14:45 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash (1)+/- 2018-07-28 11:55 7 years ago
  
  [roboticus]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash [10] 2018-07-28 12:09 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash [18](2/4)+/- 2018-07-28 15:02 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash [9](1/2)+/- 2018-07-28 15:22 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re^3: retain longest multi words units from hash [5](1)+/- 2018-07-28 17:07 7 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re^4: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-28 17:12 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-29 03:47 7 years ago
    
    [AnomalousMonk]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash (2/4)+/- 2018-07-28 15:21 7 years ago
  
  [tybalt89]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash (updated) 2018-07-28 15:32 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash (1/2)+/- 2018-07-28 16:57 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: retain longest multi words units from hash (1)+/- 2018-07-28 20:09 7 years ago
      
      [tybalt89]
      - Re^4: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-28 20:38 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-29 09:56 7 years ago
  
  [shmem]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-29 10:04 7 years ago
  
  [kcott]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash (1/3/2)+/- 2018-07-29 16:52 7 years ago
  
  [tobyink]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash (1/2)+/- 2018-07-29 21:21 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: retain longest multi words units from hash (1)+/- 2018-07-30 10:43 7 years ago
      
      [tobyink]
      - Re^4: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-30 22:46 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash (1)+/- 2018-07-29 20:52 7 years ago
  
  [PatrickofJohn]
  - Re^2: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-29 21:30 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
- Re: retain longest multi words units from hash 2018-07-30 01:37 7 years ago
  
  [atcroft]
nth field extraction (A:3/9/1)+/- 2018-07-27 07:20 7 years ago

[lee_crites]
- Re: nth field extraction (1/3)+/- 2018-07-27 07:32 7 years ago
  
  [Corion]
  - Re^2: nth field extraction (2)+/- 2018-07-27 14:39 7 years ago
    
    [lee_crites]
    - Re^3: nth field extraction 2018-07-29 18:18 7 years ago
      
      [Marshall]
    - Re^3: nth field extraction 2018-07-29 18:43 7 years ago
      
      [AnomalousMonk]
- Re: nth field extraction (2/3/1)+/- 2018-07-27 09:57 7 years ago
  
  [anonymized user 468275]
  - Re^2: nth field extraction (1)+/- 2018-07-27 14:27 7 years ago
    
    [lee_crites]
    - Re^3: nth field extraction 2018-07-30 14:37 7 years ago
      
      [anonymized user 468275]
  - Re^2: nth field extraction 2018-07-27 20:51 7 years ago
    
    [AnomalousMonk]
- Re: nth field extraction 2018-07-27 14:57 7 years ago
  
  [AnomalousMonk]
substituting 1 escaped character for another (F:4/14/1)+/- 2018-07-26 16:48 7 years ago

[craigt]
- Re: substituting 1 escaped character for another (1)+/- 2018-07-26 16:59 7 years ago
  
  [pryrt]
  - Re^2: substituting 1 escaped character for another 2018-07-26 17:49 7 years ago
    
    [choroba]
- Re: substituting 1 escaped character for another (1/8)+/- 2018-07-26 17:02 7 years ago
  
  [herveus]
  - Re^2: substituting 1 escaped character for another (2/7)+/- 2018-07-26 17:25 7 years ago
    
    [craigt]
    - Re^3: substituting 1 escaped character for another 2018-07-26 17:29 7 years ago
      
      [mr_mischief]
    - Re^3: substituting 1 escaped character for another (2/5)+/- 2018-07-26 21:35 7 years ago
      
      [Marshall]
      - Re^4: substituting 1 escaped character for another [6] 2018-07-26 21:48 7 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re^4: substituting 1 escaped character for another (1/3)+/- 2018-07-26 22:42 7 years ago
        
        [Veltro]
        
        Re^5: substituting 1 escaped character for another (1/2)+/- 2018-07-26 23:03 7 years ago
        
        [Marshall]
        
        Re^6: substituting 1 escaped character for another (1)+/- 2018-07-26 23:25 7 years ago
        
        [Veltro]
        
        Re^7: substituting 1 escaped character for another 2018-07-27 02:22 7 years ago
        
        [Marshall]
- Re: substituting 1 escaped character for another 2018-07-27 11:24 7 years ago
  
  [kcott]
- Re: substituting 1 escaped character for another (1)+/- 2018-07-30 05:13 7 years ago
  
  [theravadamonk]
  - Re^2: substituting 1 escaped character for another 2018-07-31 14:09 7 years ago
    
    [craigt]
doughnut charts with gd:graph (F:4/10/1)+/- 2018-07-25 09:59 7 years ago

[theravadamonk]
- Re: doughnut charts with gd:graph (2/6/1)+/- 2018-07-25 10:23 7 years ago
  
  [hippo]
  - Re^2: doughnut charts with gd:graph (1/3)+/- 2018-07-25 11:53 7 years ago
    
    [theravadamonk]
    - Re^3: doughnut charts with gd:graph (2)+/- 2018-07-25 13:06 7 years ago
      
      [hippo]
      - Re^4: doughnut charts with gd:graph 2018-07-26 10:30 7 years ago
        
        [theravadamonk]
      - Re^4: doughnut charts with gd:graph 2018-07-26 11:31 7 years ago
        
        [Tux]
  - Re^2: doughnut charts with gd:graph (1)+/- 2018-07-30 04:42 7 years ago
    
    [theravadamonk]
    - Re^3: doughnut charts with gd:graph 2018-08-01 04:15 7 years ago
      
      [theravadamonk]
- Re: doughnut charts with gd:graph 2018-07-25 10:34 7 years ago
  
  [marto]
- Re: doughnut charts with gd:graph 2018-07-25 13:28 7 years ago
  
  [roboticus]
- Re: doughnut charts with gd:graph 2018-07-26 13:18 7 years ago
  
  [anonymized user 468275]
PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak (F:5/19/3)+/- 2018-07-20 21:11 7 years ago

[sezal]
- Re: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak (2/3/1)+/- 2018-07-20 21:59 7 years ago
  
  [dave_the_m]
  - Re^2: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak 2018-07-30 08:19 7 years ago
    
    [sezal]
  - Re^2: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak (1)+/- 2018-08-16 13:44 7 years ago
    
    [eserte]
    - Re^3: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak 2018-08-16 18:22 7 years ago
      
      [dave_the_m]
- Re: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak (1)+/- 2018-07-20 22:38 7 years ago
  
  [haukex]
  - Re^2: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak 2018-07-30 07:22 7 years ago
    
    [sezal]
- Re: PL_strtab/SHAREKEYS and copy-on-write leak 2018-08-16 13:33 7 years ago
  
  [eserte]
sorting and merging in perl (A:2/17/4)+/- 2018-07-18 14:41 7 years ago

[Sekhar Reddy]
- Re: sorting and merging in perl [9](1)+/- 2018-07-18 17:27 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: sorting and merging in perl 2018-08-18 22:40 7 years ago
    
    [Sekhar Reddy]
- Re: sorting and merging in perl (2/14/4)+/- 2018-07-18 19:34 7 years ago
  
  [Veltro]
  - Re^2: sorting and merging in perl 2018-07-23 07:00 7 years ago
    
    [Sekhar Reddy]

+/-Meditations (Top)

RIP Win 10 (A:2/5/1)+/- 2018-07-30 15:01 7 years ago

[anonymized user 468275]
- Re: RIP Win 10 (2/3)+/- 2018-07-30 20:48 7 years ago
  
  [SuicideJunkie]
  - Re^2: RIP Win 10 (1)+/- 2018-07-31 13:01 7 years ago
    
    [anonymized user 468275]
    - Re^3: RIP Win 10 2018-08-09 14:00 7 years ago
      
      [SuicideJunkie]
  - Re^2: RIP Win 10 2018-07-31 14:44 7 years ago
    
    [Tux]
- Re: RIP Win 10 2018-08-11 04:59 7 years ago
  
  [wjw]
RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (FA:4/20/8)+/- 2018-07-30 06:26 7 years ago

[shmem]
- Re: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (2/6/2)+/- 2018-07-30 10:29 7 years ago
  
  [tobyink]
  - Re^2: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1)+/- 2018-07-30 15:05 7 years ago
    
    [shmem]
    - Re^3: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-07-30 18:57 7 years ago
      
      [tobyink]
  - Re^2: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1/3)+/- 2018-09-08 01:46 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1/2)+/- 2018-09-09 20:04 7 years ago
      
      [tobyink]
      - Re^4: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1)+/- 2018-09-09 21:34 7 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-09-18 08:23 7 years ago
        
        [tobyink]
- Re: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-07-30 10:37 7 years ago
  
  [tobyink]
- Re: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1/7/3)+/- 2018-07-30 14:43 7 years ago
  
  [holli]
  - Re^2: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (3/6/2)+/- 2018-07-30 15:14 7 years ago
    
    [shmem]
    - Re^3: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1/2/1)+/- 2018-07-30 15:30 7 years ago
      
      [holli]
      - Re^4: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1)+/- 2018-07-30 22:35 7 years ago
        
        [shmem]
        
        Re^5: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-07-31 07:49 7 years ago
        
        [tobyink]
    - Re^3: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-08-01 00:01 7 years ago
      
      [RonW]
    - Re^3: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1)+/- 2018-08-01 15:58 7 years ago
      
      [Eily]
      - Re^4: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-08-01 23:51 7 years ago
        
        [shmem]
- Re: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1/3)+/- 2018-08-01 14:07 7 years ago
  
  [tobyink]
  - Re^2: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1/2)+/- 2018-08-01 15:11 7 years ago
    
    [shmem]
    - Re^3: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? (1)+/- 2018-08-01 15:27 7 years ago
      
      [tobyink]
      - Re^4: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword? 2018-08-01 22:58 7 years ago
        
        [shmem]
Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (FA:5/16/1)+/- 2018-06-29 01:35 7 years ago

[syphilis]
- Re: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (1)+/- 2018-06-29 09:07 7 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
  - Re^2: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values 2018-06-30 02:25 7 years ago
    
    [syphilis]
- Re: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (MS Windows) 2018-07-02 14:29 7 years ago
  
  [syphilis]
- Re: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values [1](1/10/1)+/- 2018-07-04 02:57 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (1/9/1)+/- 2018-07-04 13:01 7 years ago
    
    [syphilis]
    - Re^3: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (1/8/1)+/- 2018-07-28 12:27 7 years ago
      
      [syphilis]
      - Re^4: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (1/7/1)+/- 2018-07-28 14:01 7 years ago
        
        [aitap]
        
        Re^5: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (2/6/1)+/- 2018-07-29 00:59 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^6: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (2)+/- 2018-07-29 12:19 7 years ago
        
        [aitap]
        
        Re^7: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values 2018-07-29 13:38 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^7: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values 2018-07-29 23:59 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^6: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (1/2/1)+/- 2018-07-29 12:56 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^7: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (1)+/- 2018-07-30 11:27 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^8: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values 2018-07-31 14:36 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
- Re: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values (powerpc64) 2018-07-05 14:09 7 years ago
  
  [syphilis]
- Re: Avoiding perl's Atof when assigning floating point values 2018-08-10 10:18 7 years ago
  
  [syphilis]

+/-Cool Uses For Perl (Top)

Exploring Type::Tiny Part 1: Using Type::Params for Validating Function Parameters (F) 2018-07-30 18:49 7 years ago

[tobyink]

+/-Polls (Top)

It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (27/84/2)+/- 2018-07-01 12:48 7 years ago

[martin]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-01 13:03 7 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-01 13:32 7 years ago
  
  [AnomalousMonk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-01 13:47 7 years ago
  
  [pryrt]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-01 19:08 7 years ago
  
  [nikosv]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-01 21:57 7 years ago
  
  [usemodperl]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-03 07:21 7 years ago
    
    [huck]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/2)+/- 2018-07-01 22:03 7 years ago
  
  [choroba]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (Perl6i) (1)+/- 2018-07-05 15:30 7 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (Perl6i) 2018-07-05 15:54 7 years ago
      
      [hippo]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (2/3)+/- 2018-07-02 00:25 7 years ago
  
  [Hoser00]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [11](1)+/- 2018-07-02 04:52 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re^3: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-05 14:04 7 years ago
      
      [Ultimatt]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-06 16:34 7 years ago
    
    [p6steve]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-02 02:51 7 years ago
  
  [gsiems]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (4/32)+/- 2018-07-02 11:55 7 years ago
  
  [woolfy]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [10](1/24)+/- 2018-07-02 12:23 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re^3: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/23)+/- 2018-07-02 12:37 7 years ago
      
      [woolfy]
      - Re^4: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (2/22)+/- 2018-07-15 13:21 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^5: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (3/20)+/- 2018-07-15 15:13 7 years ago
        
        [liz]
        
        Re^6: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/12)+/- 2018-07-15 21:08 7 years ago
        
        [BrowserUk]
        
        Re^7: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (2/11)+/- 2018-07-15 21:55 7 years ago
        
        [liz]
        
        Re^8: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/2)+/- 2018-07-16 12:09 7 years ago
        
        [choroba]
        
        Re^9: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-16 12:28 7 years ago
        
        [liz]
        
        Re^10: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [-X] 2018-07-17 06:40 7 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
        
        Re^6: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/2)+/- 2018-07-17 12:05 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^7: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-17 14:25 7 years ago
        
        [Arunbear]
        
        Re^8: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-18 12:30 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^6: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/3)+/- 2018-07-17 12:23 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^7: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/2)+/- 2018-07-17 12:48 7 years ago
        
        [liz]
        
        Re^8: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-18 12:38 7 years ago
        
        [syphilis]
        
        Re^9: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-18 13:50 7 years ago
        
        [liz]
        
        Re^5: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-16 16:38 7 years ago
        
        [Jenda]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/4)+/- 2018-07-02 12:23 7 years ago
    
    [hippo]
    - Re^3: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/3)+/- 2018-07-02 12:57 7 years ago
      
      [woolfy]
      - Re^4: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/2)+/- 2018-07-04 07:25 7 years ago
        
        [dsheroh]
        
        Re^5: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-14 17:09 7 years ago
        
        [Jenda]
        
        Re^6: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-14 20:00 7 years ago
        
        [liz]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-04 13:23 7 years ago
    
    [Laurent_R]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-14 16:53 7 years ago
    
    [Jenda]
- Another viewpoint ? 2018-07-02 13:18 7 years ago
  
  [eco]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-02 16:08 7 years ago
  
  [fishy]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-04 07:00 7 years ago
    
    [dsheroh]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [10] 2018-07-03 06:51 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-03 15:14 7 years ago
  
  [perldigious]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-03 23:13 7 years ago
  
  [dbuckhal]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-04 15:42 7 years ago
  
  [QM]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-05 20:16 7 years ago
  
  [Trucklejunior]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-13 22:39 7 years ago
  
  [wjw]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [7](1/3)+/- 2018-07-15 19:12 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1/2)+/- 2018-07-15 21:16 7 years ago
    
    [BrowserUk]
    - Re^3: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [9](1)+/- 2018-07-15 23:08 7 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re^4: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-16 15:28 7 years ago
        
        [BrowserUk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-16 13:12 7 years ago
  
  [shmem]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-17 07:55 7 years ago
  
  [Tux]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-25 14:03 7 years ago
    
    [1nickt]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-07-17 11:07 7 years ago
  
  [bliako]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [3] 2018-07-17 18:32 7 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [4] 2018-07-21 19:08 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-24 22:40 7 years ago
  
  [snoopy]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [4](1)+/- 2018-07-30 18:15 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-07-30 21:36 7 years ago
    
    [liz]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [-X](1/2)+/- 2018-08-23 16:42 7 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? (1)+/- 2018-08-23 18:09 7 years ago
    
    [Jenda]
    - Re^3: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? [0] 2018-08-23 19:17 7 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer? 2018-08-24 12:19 7 years ago
  
  [TheloniusMonk]

+/-Users (Top)

marlencrabapple 2018-07-31 02:42 7 years ago
JimGibson 2018-07-30 22:19 7 years ago
sverma77 2018-07-30 21:06 7 years ago
topherv 2018-07-30 17:51 7 years ago
alialialia 2018-07-30 11:49 7 years ago
Poolstar 2018-07-30 06:20 7 years ago

+/-Legend (Top)

Title [^1](AC:3/9/7)+/- [author]

Means: You "^"=up- or "v"=down-voted, "1"=reputation; "AC" from ( Front-paged, Approved, Unapproved, Considered, or link to Parent or Root ); Replies: "3" direct, "9" descendents, "7" recent, "+/-" shows/hides(uses javascript)

View Full Documentation, Show Legend at Top

Page Settings