Re^2: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive?

Thanks for the hints. I have been looking at Activestates offering and found in comparison that Win32::Daemon looks promising. For this reason, I want to know what is happening to that particular module.

Comment on Re^2: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by Marshall (Canon) on Jun 30, 2009 at 03:41 UTC
I'd be curious to know what you find out re: ActiveState vs Win32::Daemon. None of my Windows programs require a daemon, but you never know....	[reply]
Re^4: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by mzedeler (Pilgrim) on Jul 01, 2009 at 07:18 UTC
Win32::Daemon is a module that allows you to write Windows Services. Take a look at the documentation - its still on CPAN.	[reply]
Re^5: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by Marshall (Canon) on Jul 02, 2009 at 22:20 UTC
Yes, I am aware of that. The question evolved into whether Win32:Daemon or the PerlSvc utility from ActiveState was "better". That I don't know. I suspect that "this depends on X,Y,Z..." (ie your mileage may vary).	[reply]
Re^6: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by mzedeler (Pilgrim) on Jul 02, 2009 at 22:58 UTC
Re^7: Win32::Daemon - dead or alive? by Marshall (Canon) on Jul 02, 2009 at 23:55 UTC