Re: checking for piped input data

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: checking for piped input data by Anonymous Monk on May 02, 2023 at 22:07 UTC
Right, that would literally be passing the entire table as the argument which is not really intuitive in terms of my script. I thought I could use pipes instead to pass the table, but the underlying script would parse and concatenate the correct column which would then be passed it to the argument of -x. I also want to be able to chain these like all unix commands...	[reply]
Re^3: checking for piped input data (XY Problem References) by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on May 02, 2023 at 22:14 UTC
Please read: How do I post a question effectively? I know what I mean. Why don't you? Short, Self-Contained, Correct Example To help us help you, please create an account ... is new user Konan (created May 07, 2023) our original anonymonk? See also haukex reply to a later follow-up anonymous post: IO::Select woes References Added Later Advice: XY Problem by jdporter (2006) On Answering Questions by merlyn (2003) XYZ Questions by chromatic (2000) Recent examples of I Know What I Mean Why Don't You: Extracting DNC issues by MoodyDreams999 (2023) How to find out if an argument is an LVALUE ? (TinyPerl) by harangzsolt33 (2023) See also: Substack OpenMP question: "Here's my bad solution to a problem I haven't described, please fix this bad solution" Rubber duck debugging (wikipedia) on Debuggers Updated: Many references were added long after the original node was written.	[reply]


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks