Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

by Your Mother (Archbishop)
on Mar 24, 2017 at 20:47 UTC ( [id://1185829]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
in thread UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

The Definitive Guide to Catalyst: Writing Extensible, Scalable and Maintainable Perl-Based Web Applications, ISBN 9781430223658.

  • Comment on Re^3: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
by sierpinski (Chaplain) on Mar 25, 2017 at 01:57 UTC
    Thanks Your Mother. I've been wanting to get deeper into Catalyst since I first played around with it a couple years ago, and now I have the chance to make a major project with it at work, so this would be a good resource I'm sure.

      I adore Catalyst. Try out all the major frameworks before making a major choice. You might find one of the others to your liking. Catalyst has very good testing utilities, for example… Mojo’s is probably better/easier. You might also read some of the email threads from the various lists to see which community seems like the best fit.

        I've played around with Dancer (ie got a Hello World template view up and running) and did a little more in Mojo, but from what I've read so far, the learning curve of Catalyst is far worth it. I agree with the sentiment that it's difficult to learn all three (or more) frameworks enough to make an informed decision, but I dabbled, and it seems like Catalyst is the way to go, especially since my grand plans for this project include potentially thousands of updates per hour, with the potential of hundreds of thousands of records. With that in mind, it seems Catalyst is the clear winner if only based on project size. (Again, this is all based on what I've read/heard.)

        Thanks a lot for your input, I appreciate the time and feedback!

Re^4: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 24, 2017 at 20:53 UTC
    Should be renamed to "Writing Extensible and Scalable Perl-Based Web Applications" because they are far from maintainable ...

      I most strenuously disagree. They are a pleasure to maintain unless you write them like they were Mason or CGI.

        That says more about you than the product. Catalyst is horribly flawed, hence why Dancer and Mojo are taking its market share. Just because YOU ... yeah ...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1185829]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-26 08:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found